Commissioners voted 4–0 to submit a management prospectus for 1,323 acres along the Shoal River.
The State would handle the land purchase, but the County could assume long-term management responsibilities.
Future costs for staffing, maintenance, and operations remain undefined and may require local funding.
Okaloosa County commissioners voted 4–0 this week to submit a county role prospectus for a proposed Shoal River Preserve partnership under the State’s Florida Forever land acquisition program.
The vote does not authorize the County to purchase land. Instead, it signals to the State that Okaloosa County is willing to serve as a long-term management partner if Florida Forever acquires 1,323 acres along the Shoal River in northeast Okaloosa County.
Florida Forever requested the prospectus by Feb. 25th, as the legislative session — which ends March 13th — will determine whether funding moves forward.
If the State completes the purchase, the County would enter into a long-term lease agreement and be required to produce a full management plan under the Florida Administrative Code. That process would include forming a steering committee and complying with state land management standards.
County Administrator Craig Coffey framed the proposal as both a conservation opportunity and a strategic move.
“It’s a way to expand their dollars… It’s a way for us to come forward and say, hey, we aren’t just asking you to do something in our backyard. We’re coming to the table with help and solutions, and we’re going to be a player. It’s a way to preserve land.”
Coffey emphasized that the County is not the lead agency on the acquisition, will not negotiate contracts or appraisals, and cannot disclose the potential purchase price.
“We are not the lead agencies. We haven’t negotiated a contract. We haven’t negotiated—we aren’t doing appraisals… So if they pay 5 million or 50 million, we don’t know.”
When asked about cost transparency, Carolyn Ketchel pressed:
“So we don’t know the price tag on what Florida Forever will purchase this for?”
County Commissioner Carolyn Ketchel questioned the timing of the request.
“Why suddenly are we being asked to manage property in our backyard?”
Coffey responded that partnering now ensures the County has a seat at the table during a period of rapid growth and land pressure.
“We can save some land now by partnering with the state. If we don’t, I’m not sure that we would be at the table.”
He described the proposal as a step forward in the County’s conservation portfolio.
“What I’m asking today is approval of the county role as prospectus… This would be a notch forward on our land management, our land acquisitions and holdings, and would be just a great amenity for our residents and tourists.”
The property would connect existing county conservation holdings — roughly 2,000 to 4,000 acres already managed as Shoal River Preserve — with the newly created Shoal River Headwaters State Park, forming a larger protected river corridor.
Plans call for a passive recreation model, not athletic complexes or heavy development.
“This is not the same as building Little League fields all over the place,” Coffey said. “Again, this is a more passive park, and it would be in the form of a long-term lease and a management plan.”
Concepts discussed include trails, overlooks, kayak launches, primitive camping, bathrooms, and limited infrastructure phased in over time.
Camping revenue and other park-related income could help fund amenities such as trails and restroom facilities.
Coffey added that conservation partnerships could also help leverage outside funding.
“This is a way for us to bring some of those dollars back into our county and accomplish some of the goals you guys have.”
While there is no immediate purchase cost to the County, staff previously indicated they anticipate requesting approximately $250,000 shortly after closing for initial management planning, public access setup, and site protection.
Long-term operational responsibilities could include:
Funding could come from money from Federal or State governments in the form of grants, from tourist development tax revenues, a Park Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU), or General Fund dollars raised from property taxes, and/or donations — though those sources are not guaranteed and would require future board approval.
The County will not negotiate the land purchase itself and will not determine the final acquisition price. Its role would begin only after the State closes on the property.
For now, the 4–0 vote simply advances the County as a willing management partner.
Whether the Shoal River expansion ultimately becomes a low-cost conservation win or a long-term fiscal obligation will depend on the final acquisition price, the structure of the management plan, and how future boards choose to fund it.
With growth continuing to push northward in Okaloosa County, commissioners made clear they see preservation as both an environmental strategy and a policy choice — one that now moves to Tallahassee for funding consideration before the legislative session ends March 13th.
Pro Communi Bono
St. Francis De Sales, Ora Pro Nobis!
Register or login with Mid Bay News and never get another pop up on our site!
